Dataset Condensation Atlas

Method · Synthetic-set parameterization

UDD

UDD: Dataset Distillation via Mining Underutilized Regions

Shiguang Wang, Zhongyu Zhang, Jian Cheng

PRCV 2024 · first public 2024-08-29 · arXiv 2408.16268

paper ↗catalogued✓ abstract read

In one paragraph

Identifies underutilized regions inside synthetic images as wasted capacity in multi-formation-style distillation, and introduces two utilization-sensitive search policies (response-based and data-jittering-based) that dynamically locate and fill these regions during optimization, together with a category-wise feature contrastive loss for inter-class separability. Reports 4.0% and 3.7% accuracy gains over the next-best method on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 at IPC=1.

Where it sits

Design choices

What is storeddownsampled-multiformation
Abstract (verbatim from arXiv)

Dataset distillation synthesizes a small dataset such that a model trained on this set approximates the performance of the original dataset. Recent studies on dataset distillation focused primarily on the design of the optimization process, with methods such as gradient matching, feature alignment, and training trajectory matching. However, little attention has been given to the issue of underutilized regions in synthetic images. In this paper, we propose UDD, a novel approach to identify and exploit the underutilized regions to make them informative and discriminate, and thus improve the utilization of the synthetic dataset. Technically, UDD involves two underutilized regions searching policies for different conditions, i.e., response-based policy and data jittering-based policy. Compared with previous works, such two policies are utilization-sensitive, equipping with the ability to dynamically adjust the underutilized regions during the training process. Additionally, we analyze the current model optimization problem and design a category-wise feature contrastive loss, which can enhance the distinguishability of different categories and alleviate the shortcomings of the existing multi-formation methods. Experimentally, our method improves the utilization of the synthetic dataset and outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on various datasets, such as MNIST, FashionMNIST, SVHN, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100. For example, the improvements on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 are 4.0\% and 3.7\% over the next best method with IPC=1, by mining the underutilized regions.

BibTeX (generated; prefer the venue's official entry)
@article{wang2024dataset,
  title   = {UDD: Dataset Distillation via Mining Underutilized Regions},
  author  = {Shiguang Wang and Zhongyu Zhang and Jian Cheng},
  journal = {PRCV 2024},
  year    = {2024}
}

Nearby in Synthetic-set parameterization

2026-03

Post Training Quantization for Efficient Dataset Condensation

Linh-Tam Tran, Sung-Ho Bae · AAAI 2026notablepaper ↗

2026-01

3DDP — Parameterization-Based Dataset Distillation of 3D Point Clouds through Learnable Shape Morphing

Dongwook Kim, Jae-Young Yim · ICLR 2026notableOther datapaper ↗code ↗

2025-07

Rate-utility DD — Dataset Distillation as Data Compression: A Rate-Utility Perspective

Youneng Bao, Yiping Liu, Zhuo Chen et al. · ICCV 2025notablepaper ↗code ↗

2025-03

DDiF — Distilling Dataset into Neural Field

Donghyeok Shin, HeeSun Bae, Gyuwon Sim et al. · ICLR 2025corepaper ↗code ↗

2024-06

H-GLaD — Hierarchical Features Matter: A Deep Exploration of Progressive Parameterization Method for Dataset Distillation

Xinhao Zhong, Hao Fang, Bin Chen et al. · CVPR 2025notablepaper ↗code ↗