Dataset Condensation Atlas

Method · Synthetic-set parameterization

Rate-utility DD

Dataset Distillation as Data Compression: A Rate-Utility Perspective

Youneng Bao, Yiping Liu, Zhuo Chen, Yongsheng Liang, Mu Li, Kede Ma

ICCV 2025 · first public 2025-07-23 · arXiv 2507.17221

paper ↗code ↗project page ↗notable✓ abstract read

In one paragraph

Frames dataset distillation as a joint rate-utility optimization: synthetic samples are optimizable latent codes decoded by extremely lightweight networks, the Shannon entropy of the quantized latents is the rate term, and any existing distillation loss serves as the utility term, traded off via a Lagrange multiplier; introduces bits-per-class (bpc), a storage metric accounting for sample, label and decoder-parameter costs, and reports up to 170x greater compression than standard distillation at comparable accuracy on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and ImageNet-128.

Where it sits

Abstract (verbatim from arXiv)

Driven by the ``scale-is-everything'' paradigm, modern machine learning increasingly demands ever-larger datasets and models, yielding prohibitive computational and storage requirements. Dataset distillation mitigates this by compressing an original dataset into a small set of synthetic samples, while preserving its full utility. Yet, existing methods either maximize performance under fixed storage budgets or pursue suitable synthetic data representations for redundancy removal, without jointly optimizing both objectives. In this work, we propose a joint rate-utility optimization method for dataset distillation. We parameterize synthetic samples as optimizable latent codes decoded by extremely lightweight networks. We estimate the Shannon entropy of quantized latents as the rate measure and plug any existing distillation loss as the utility measure, trading them off via a Lagrange multiplier. To enable fair, cross-method comparisons, we introduce bits per class (bpc), a precise storage metric that accounts for sample, label, and decoder parameter costs. On CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet-128, our method achieves up to $170\times$ greater compression than standard distillation at comparable accuracy. Across diverse bpc budgets, distillation losses, and backbone architectures, our approach consistently establishes better rate-utility trade-offs.

BibTeX (generated; prefer the venue's official entry)
@article{bao2025dataset,
  title   = {Dataset Distillation as Data Compression: A Rate-Utility Perspective},
  author  = {Youneng Bao and Yiping Liu and Zhuo Chen and Yongsheng Liang and Mu Li and Kede Ma},
  journal = {ICCV 2025},
  year    = {2025}
}

Nearby in Synthetic-set parameterization

2026-03

Post Training Quantization for Efficient Dataset Condensation

Linh-Tam Tran, Sung-Ho Bae · AAAI 2026notablepaper ↗

2026-01

3DDP — Parameterization-Based Dataset Distillation of 3D Point Clouds through Learnable Shape Morphing

Dongwook Kim, Jae-Young Yim · ICLR 2026notableOther datapaper ↗code ↗

2025-03

DDiF — Distilling Dataset into Neural Field

Donghyeok Shin, HeeSun Bae, Gyuwon Sim et al. · ICLR 2025corepaper ↗code ↗

2024-06

H-GLaD — Hierarchical Features Matter: A Deep Exploration of Progressive Parameterization Method for Dataset Distillation

Xinhao Zhong, Hao Fang, Bin Chen et al. · CVPR 2025notablepaper ↗code ↗

2023-12

Static-dynamic video DD — Dancing with Still Images: Video Distillation via Static-Dynamic Disentanglement

Ziyu Wang, Yue Xu, Cewu Lu et al. · CVPR 2024coreVideopaper ↗code ↗