Method · Gradient matching
LCMat
Loss-Curvature Matching for Dataset Selection and Condensation
Seungjae Shin, Heesun Bae, Donghyeok Shin, Weonyoung Joo, Il-Chul Moon
AISTATS 2023 · first public 2023-03-08 · arXiv 2303.04449
In one paragraph
Matches the loss curvature — not just the loss value or a first-order gradient — of the original and reduced datasets over a neighborhood of the model-parameter space, deriving an implementable upper bound on the worst-case curvature gap, and applies the same objective to both coreset selection and dataset condensation, improving generalization over existing baselines in both settings.
Where it sits
- Gradient matching (Surrogate matching)
- Coreset selection (Selection)
- Setting: Image classification
Abstract (verbatim from arXiv)
Training neural networks on a large dataset requires substantial computational costs. Dataset reduction selects or synthesizes data instances based on the large dataset, while minimizing the degradation in generalization performance from the full dataset. Existing methods utilize the neural network during the dataset reduction procedure, so the model parameter becomes important factor in preserving the performance after reduction. By depending upon the importance of parameters, this paper introduces a new reduction objective, coined LCMat, which Matches the Loss Curvatures of the original dataset and reduced dataset over the model parameter space, more than the parameter point. This new objective induces a better adaptation of the reduced dataset on the perturbed parameter region than the exact point matching. Particularly, we identify the worst case of the loss curvature gap from the local parameter region, and we derive the implementable upper bound of such worst-case with theoretical analyses. Our experiments on both coreset selection and condensation benchmarks illustrate that LCMat shows better generalization performances than existing baselines.
BibTeX (generated; prefer the venue's official entry)
@article{shin2023loss,
title = {Loss-Curvature Matching for Dataset Selection and Condensation},
author = {Seungjae Shin and Heesun Bae and Donghyeok Shin and Weonyoung Joo and Il-Chul Moon},
journal = {AISTATS 2023},
year = {2023}
}Nearby in Gradient matching
Linear Gradient Matching — Dataset Distillation for Pre-Trained Self-Supervised Vision Models
George Cazenavette, Antonio Torralba, Vincent Sitzmann · NeurIPS 2025notablePre-training & transferpaper ↗code ↗
Distilled Datamodel with Reverse Gradient Matching
Jingwen Ye, Ruonan Yu, Songhua Liu et al. · CVPR 2024notablepaper ↗
Static-dynamic video DD — Dancing with Still Images: Video Distillation via Static-Dynamic Disentanglement
Ziyu Wang, Yue Xu, Cewu Lu et al. · CVPR 2024coreVideopaper ↗code ↗