Dataset Condensation Atlas

Method · Distribution and feature matching

Algorithmic Guarantees for Distilling Supervised and Offline RL Datasets

Aaryan Gupta, Rishi Saket, Aravindan Raghuveer

ICLR 2026 · first public 2025-11-29 · arXiv 2512.00536

paper ↗notable✓ abstract read

In one paragraph

Gives a dataset-distillation algorithm for linear regression that matches training and synthetic losses with respect to a fixed set of randomly sampled regressors, with no model training in the loop, proving it needs only O(d^2) sampled regressors for any bounded linear model's synthetic-data loss to track its real-data loss (with a matching Omega(d^2) lower bound), then extends the algorithm to offline reinforcement learning by matching Bellman loss instead of behavioral cloning, using both rewards and next-state information.

Where it sits

Design choices

Optimization regimetraining-free
Prior / networks usedrandom-networks
Abstract (verbatim from arXiv)

Given a training dataset, the goal of dataset distillation is to derive a synthetic dataset such that models trained on the latter perform as well as those trained on the training dataset. In this work, we develop and analyze an efficient dataset distillation algorithm for supervised learning, specifically regression in $\mathbb{R}^d$, based on matching the losses on the training and synthetic datasets with respect to a fixed set of randomly sampled regressors without any model training. Our first key contribution is a novel performance guarantee proving that our algorithm needs only $\tilde{O}(d^2)$ sampled regressors to derive a synthetic dataset on which the MSE loss of any bounded linear model is nearly the same as its MSE loss on the given training data. In particular, the model optimized on the synthetic data has close to minimum loss on the training data, thus performing nearly as well as the model optimized on the latter. Complementing this, we also prove a matching lower bound of $\Omega(d^2)$ for the number of sampled regressors showing the tightness of our analysis. Our second contribution is to extend our algorithm to offline RL dataset distillation by matching the Bellman loss, unlike previous works which used a behavioral cloning objective. This is the first such method which leverages both, the rewards and the next state information, available in offline RL datasets, without any policy model optimization. Our algorithm generates a synthetic dataset whose Bellman loss with respect to any linear action-value predictor is close to the latter's Bellman loss on the offline RL training dataset. Therefore, a policy associated with an action-value predictor optimized on the synthetic dataset performs nearly as well as that derived from the one optimized on the training data. We conduct experiments to validate our theoretical guarantees and observe performance gains.

BibTeX (generated; prefer the venue's official entry)
@article{gupta2025algorithmic,
  title   = {Algorithmic Guarantees for Distilling Supervised and Offline RL Datasets},
  author  = {Aaryan Gupta and Rishi Saket and Aravindan Raghuveer},
  journal = {ICLR 2026},
  year    = {2025}
}

Nearby in Distribution and feature matching

2026-06

RAHA — Rank-Aware Hyperbolic Alignment for Vision-Language Dataset Distillation

Jongoh Jeong, Sun-Kyung Lee, Kuk-Jin Yoon · ECCV 2026notableVision–languagepaper ↗code ↗

2026-05

MDM — Multimodal Distribution Matching for Vision-Language Dataset Distillation

Jongoh Jeong, Hoyong Kwon, Minseok Kim et al. · CVPR 2026notableVision–languagepaper ↗code ↗

2026-03

Sneakdoor — SNEAKDOOR: Stealthy Backdoor Attacks against Distribution Matching-based Dataset Condensation

He Yang, Dongyi Lv, Song Ma et al. · NeurIPS 2025notablepaper ↗code ↗

2026-03

Harmonic Dataset Distillation for Time Series Forecasting

Seungha Hong, Sanghwan Jang, Wonbin Kweon et al. · AAAI 2026notableTime seriespaper ↗

2025-11

DP-GENG — DP-GENG: Differentially Private Dataset Distillation Guided by DP-Generated Data

Shuo Shi, Jinghuai Zhang, Shijie Jiang et al. · AAAI 2026notablepaper ↗